I read a lot of political posts, some more obnoxious than others.  To let my liberal readers know, if you are trying to actually convince someone of something (rather than rage or whine or perform public bonding with their chosen clique of like minded internet denizens) you should not use the term “teabagger.”  As in sub-titling your rant, “teabaggers take note.”  Not only are you insuring that anyone involved in any tea party is going to ignore your rant, however clever you think it is, because no one has enough spare time to go out of their way to be insulted, but you telegraph the fact your politics are juvenile and not particularly well thought out.

If you use “teabagger” in a post, I know the following about you:

  • You refer to G.W.Bush as a Fascist and our government as a Democracy, but you become obnoxiously anal and pedantic about definitions of political terms when someone calls Obama a socialist.
  • You believe that it was a miscarriage of justice when this black person was fired for allegedly bigoted comments that were taken out of context, but when this black person was fired for allegedly bigoted comments that were taken out of context, he had it coming.
  • You believe Anita Hill was a martyr for women’s rights and Paula Jones was opportunistic trailer trash going after someone for partisan political purposes.
  • You think George Soros is a benign philanthropist doing his best to support charitably progressive causes, and the brothers Charles and David Koch are shadowy puppet-masters funneling money into American politics to further their own sinister agenda.
  • You thought enacting the Patriot Act was a horrible miscarriage of civil rights, all the way up to the point it was made permanent, when it wasn’t worth complaining about anymore.
  • You think Janeane Garofalo makes sense when she says that calls for a smaller federal government are a coded message meaning “we hate black people.”
  • You think that Media Matters would never slant a story.
  • You think Al Franken was funny, once.
  • You don’t find it ironic that an allegedly anti-establishment comic is holding a political rally that’s pretty much in support of the satus quo over an insurgent political movement.
  • You’ve never watched an episode of Glen Beck or listened to Rush Limbaugh but not only do you know their position on every issue of import, you regularly condemn them for those opinions.
  • You never thought speculation about Trig Pailin’s maternity the least bit creepy.
  • You believe dumping a trillion dollars of stimulus money into the economy is the only thing that saved us from a great depression, but you believe that taking the same amount back out of the economy by taking it from rich people will have no adverse economic impact.

3 Comments

Steve Buchheit · October 25, 2010 at 12:51 pm

Well, other than that was the term first touted by those that espoused the philosophy and is just reiterated as fodder for the mill.

I could make similar lists for “lamestream media” (or the more ubiquitous MSM), Democrats = Socialists, or other shorthanded phrases.

vera · November 5, 2010 at 10:47 pm

Wow, if one uses a term for a person that is part of the tea party movement, teabagger — in order to address their role as a follower of that movement — you — blogger — can make all kinds of snap judgements about that person because of your superior intellect and stereotyping powers……hmmmmm, just like the ‘liberals’ using the *teabagger take note* line in their emails or posts, you are able to “perform public bonding with their [your] chosen clique” and “Not only are you insuring that anyone involved in any tea party [liberal party] is going to ignore your rant, however clever you think it is, because no one has enough spare time to go out of their way to be insulted, but you telegraph the fact your politics are juvenile and not particularly well thought out….
Well spoken — but it’s funny how it applies so aptly to your comments as well. Ah, the double edged sword… it’s a bitch.

    S Andrew Swann · November 5, 2010 at 11:22 pm

    So, Vera, you must really be emotionally invested in using that term aren’t you? I guess whatever makes you happy. I should point out that the reversal of logic you’re attempting there doesn’t quite make sense. Unless you’re arguing that voicing the opinion “using the term teabagger telegraphs
    an ill-thought-out political worldview, and is gratuitously insulting” is itself telegraphing an ill-thought-out political worldview, and is gratuitously insulting.

    To which I’ll say: Arguing that voicing the opinion “using the term teabagger telegraphs an ill-thought-out political worldview, and is gratuitously insulting” is itself telegraphing an ill-thought-out political worldview, and is gratuitously insulting itself telegraphs an ill-thought-out political worldview, and is gratuitously insulting.

Comments are closed.